Nik Razborsek vs Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W L L W L L
Form
L W L L L W L W L LHead To Head: Razborsek 2 - 0 Rodriguez-Pace
They have played 4 sets in total, with Razborsek winning 4 and Rodriguez-Pace winning 0. The last match between Razborsek and Rodriguez-Pace was at the Germany F6, 05-07-2016, First, Clay with Nik Razborsek getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nik Razborsek | 2 |
| Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace | 0 |
Germany F6(05-07-2016)
6
2
6
4
| Razborsek | Stats | Rodriguez-Pace |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 36% (4-7) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 854 |
| 409 | Highest Rank | 282 |
| 31 | Age | 31 |
| L | Plays | - |
| 6 | Titles | 11 |
| 63% (224-130) | Career Total W/L | 60% (480-323) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Dzumhur VS Arnaldi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Khachanov VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Razborsek VS Rodriguez-Pace H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Nik Razborsek
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| 7-6(2) 6-4 | |||||
Razborsek VS Rodriguez-Pace H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 16 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 0:48:30 | Average Match Time | 0:48:30 |
| 56% (31/55) | 1st Serve % | 68% (38/56) |
| 71% (22/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (21/38) |
| 54% (13/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 28% (5/18) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (2/6) |
| 54% (30/56) | Return Points Win % | 36% (20/55) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nik Razborsek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 1 | 4-6 7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Danylo Kalenichenko
Player
Nik Razborsek
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nik Razborsek
Player
Andrew Paulson
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
4
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
34 of
41)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Nik Razborsek
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
14 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaroslav Pospisil
Player
Nik Razborsek
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
11
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nik Razborsek
Player
Francesco Vilardo
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Nik Razborsek
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
6
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nik Razborsek
Player
Jiri Jenicek
47%
(
17 of
36)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nik Razborsek
Player
Vaclav Safranek
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Nik Razborsek
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ilija Palavestra
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve %
74%
(
69 of
93)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Darwin Blanch
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
70%
(
73 of
105)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
45 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
107
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elijah Strode
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
94%
(
15 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Brumm
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
56%
(
5 of
9)
1st Serve %
50%
(
5 of
10)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
100%
(
5 of
5)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
13
Total Points Won
6
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Jack Loge
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
74%
(
51 of
69)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (224/130) | Win/Loss | 60% (480/323) |
| 61% (489/310) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (1056/765) |
| 55% (4023/3248) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (8969/7748) |
| 58% (25/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 63% (250/145) |
| 65% (197/108) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (214/163) |
| 40% (2/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52% (16/15) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 261 | Aces Total | 929 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.09 |
| 466 | Total Double Faults | 748 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:1:3 |
| 558.72 | Average Opponent Rank | 520.05 |
| 61% (7061/11656) | 1st Serve % | 68% (19693/28757) |
| 65% (4620/7061) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (12675/19693) |
| 48% (2210/4595) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (4431/9062) |
| 47% (633/1357) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1337/3021) |
| 44% (5108/11677) | Return Points Win % | 41% (11891/28939) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (1/3) | Cups W/L | 71% (22/9) |
| 0% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (9/7) | Challenger W/L | 48% (46/50) |
| 64% (214/118) | Futures W/L | 61% (412/263) |
| 63% (218/346) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (457/769) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (16/24) |
| 43% (33/76) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (109/199) |
| 52% (48/93) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (103/193) |
| 89% (222/197) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (456/416) |
| 11% (222/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (456/40) |
| 20% (132/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (347/62) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
